ERATOSTHENES’İN “BULUŞ”UNDAN PTOLEMAIOS’UN “DEVRİM”İNE ANTİKÇAĞ’DA COĞRAFYANIN MÜESSESLEŞMESI [THE INSTITUTIONALISATION OF GEOGRAPHY IN ANTIQUITY FROM THE “INVENTION” OF ERATOSTHENES TO THE “REVOLUTION” OF PTOLEMY]

“Eratosthenes’in “Buluş”undan Ptolemaios’un “Devrim”ine Antikçağ’da Coğrafyanın Müessesleşmesi” [The Institutionalisation of Geography in Antiquity from the “Invention” of Eratosthenes to the “Revolution” of Ptolemy]

2023, “Eratosthenes’in “Buluş”undan Ptolemaios’un “Devrim”ine Antikçağ’da Coğrafyanın Müessesleşmesi” [The Institutionalisation of Geography in Antiquity from the “Invention” of Eratosthenes to the “Revolution” of Ptolemy], in: Betül Yurtalan – Muharrem Samet Bilgin, (eds.), Din ve Coğrafya Sempozyumu I: “Erken Dönem İslam Kültüründe Coğrafya Algısı (H. II-V. Asırlar)”, Çorum: Hitit University Press, 17-19.

MIRAS MI REDDİ MIRAS MI?: IOANNES COTTUNIUS VE ARISTOTELES’IN FIZIK’ININ LATINCE TERCÜMELERI[INHERITENCE OR DENIAL OF INHERITANCE? IOANNES COTTUNIUS AND LATIN TRANSLATIONS OF ARISTOTLE’S PHYSICS]

 

Miras mı Reddi Miras mı?: Ioannes Cottunius ve Aristoteles’in Fizik’inin Latince Tercümeleri

 

"Miras mı Reddi Miras mı?: Ioannes Cottunius ve Aristoteles’in Fizik’inin Latince Tercümeleri" [Inheritence or Denial of Inheritance? Ioannes Cottunius and Latin Translations of Aristotle’s Physics]. Yanyalı Esad Efendi Çalıştayı [Workshop of Yanyali Esad Efendi], October 21st-22nd, 2022, ISAM Conferance Hall, Istanbul.

KEŞFEDİLEN DOĞA: PHYSIS MEFHUMUNUN YUNAN DÜŞÜNCESİNDE İNŞASI” [DISCOVERED NATURE: THE CONSTRACTION OF THE CONCEPT OF PHYSIS IN GREEK THOUGHT].

 Keşfedilen Doğa: Physis Mefhumunun Yunan Düşüncesinde İnşası

2022, “Keşfedilen Doğa: Physis Mefhumunun Yunan Düşüncesinde İnşası” [Discovered Nature: The Construction of the Concept of Physis in Greek Thought]. in: P. Atayman Erçelik, (ed.) Navisalvia 2019 Sina Kabağaç'ı Anma Toplantısı: Doğa / Natura. Istanbul: Archaeology and Art Publications, 31-59.

“GUILLAUME BUDÉ: AN EFFICIENT TRANSFORMER OF GREEK LEXICOGRAPHY IN EARLY MODERN EUROPE” [GUILLAUME BUDÉ: ERKEN MODERN AVRUPA’DA YUNAN SÖZLÜKBİLİMİNİN ETKİLİ BİR DÖNÜŞTÜRÜCÜSÜ]

Guillaume Budé: An Efficient Transformer of Greek Lexicography in Early Modern Europe
“Guillaume Budé: An Efficient Transformer of Greek Lexicography in Early Modern Europe.” was presented in: Asialex 2019: The 13th International Conference of the Asian Association for Lexicography, Istanbul University, Faculty of Letters (Istanbul/Turkey), June 21st, 2019, at 11:15 in François Meninski Hall, the Rectorate of Istanbul University.

TWO DISTINCT EPINICIAN STYLES: UNIQUENESS OF POETIC EXPRESSION IN BACCHYLIDES’ AND PINDAR’S VICTORY ODES

Two Distinct Epinician Styles: Uniqueness of Poetic Expression in Bacchylides’ and Pindar’s Victory Odes

2013, "Two Distinct Epinician Styles: Uniqueness of Poetic Expression in Bacchylides’ and Pindar’s Victory Odes." şurada: Book of Proceedings 13th International Language, Literature and Stylistics Symposium: Simple Style September, 26-28, 2013, Kars: Kafkas University, 615-627.

Abstract

Beginning with the criticism in antiquity scholars have commonly perceived Bacchylides “the Cean nightingale” and Pindar “the Theban eagle,” as two rival poets inepinician poetry with totally different styles. Dionysius of Halicarnassus is one of theearliest critics who explores this stylistic bifurcation clearly. Dionysius’ distinctionbetween “austere” (austêra) and “polished” (glaphyra) forms of composition makes theidentification of the prominent bifurcation between the styles of Bacchylides and Pindar possible. Defining this stylistic bifurcation accurately is only possible by scrutinizing thecategories represented by the music in the archaic epoch, which is an integral part of epinician poetry. These musical categories clarify how the style chosen by the Archaic Greek poet is parallel to the ethical references of the performed music of epinician. In thispaper which takes its point of departure from the above-mentioned stylistic bifurcation, I will argue that both poets have their “unique” expressions in stylistic contexts via acomparative study of some pieces of Bacchylides’ and Pindar’s victory odes.

Keywords: austere style, Bacchylides, epinician poetry, Pindar, polished style, stylistic bifurcation.